Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 263 of 2018 Revisionist :- Rojuddin Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr.
Counsel for Revisionist :- Shamsher Bahadur Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
This criminal revision has been preferred on behalf of revisionist seeking the quashing of judgement and order dated 03.11.2017 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.4, Meerut in Criminal appeal No.64 of 2017 (Rajudin vs. Smt. Naushaba and another) and judgement and order dated 04.04.2017 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.8, Meerut in Case No.1013 of 2015 (Smt. Naushaba vs. Rojudin), under Sections 17, 18, 19, 20, 32, 22, 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, P.S.- Parikshitgarh, District-Meerut.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. and also perused the record.
Counsel for the revisionist has not been able to point out any such illegality, impropriety or incorrectness in either of the impugned orders which may persuade this Court to interfere in the same. The impugned orders reflect judicial application of mind. All the relevant facts have been gone into in right perspective. An amount of Rs.15,00/- per month was fixed as interim maintenance during the course of proceedings. This is a paltry amount and in the present days of high price rise it cannot be said to be either excessive or disproportionate or exorbitant. Moreover, the final adjudication has to be arrived at on the basis of evidence and material that may be produced during the course of proceeding. At this stage, this Court does not see any good reason to interfere in either of the impugned orders or proceedings.
The revision lacks merit and therefore same stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 22.2.2018 M. Kumar