Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16246 of 2017 Petitioner :- Rishi Awasthi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- A.C.Tiwari(Ac) Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Diwakar Singh,Vikram Bahadur Singh
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri V.B.Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.3 and Shri Diwakar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.4 as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2.
By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has come to this Court challenging the selection of respondent No.5 on the post of Shiksha Mitra, which was made in 2005 on the ground that extra marks were given to her. Therefore, she is not eligible to continue as Shiksha Mitra. Consequently, she cannot be absorbed as Assistant Teacher.
The claim of the petitioner is highly belated and at this stage, he cannot question the appointment of respondent No.5.
The writ petition is misconceived and it is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 18.4.2017 Ashish Tripathi