IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE CRP No.274/2018 C/W W.P. NO.44721/2018 (GM-CPC) CRP No.274/2018 BETWEEN:
SMT. RENUKA W/O RAJENDRA R/AT. No.24, 1ST CROSS 17TH MAIN, VINAYAKANAGAR J.P. NAGAR PUTTENHALLI BANGALORE-560 078.
(By Mr. SACHIN V.R. ADV.) AND:
SRI. B.M. PRASANNA KUMAR S/O LATE B.T. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT. No.2035, 2ND FLOOR 1ST CROSS, 17TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE INDIRANAGAR, BENGALURU-560038.
(By Mr. S.R. HEGDE, ADV.) - - -
… PETITIONER … RESPONDENT This CRP is filed under Section 18 of the Karnataka Small Cause Courts Act, 1964, R/W Section 115 of the CPC., against the judgment and decree dated 26-04-2017 passed in SC No.754/2014 on the file of the III Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Court of Small Causes Bangalore partly decreeing the suit for ejectment and mesne profit.
WP No.44721/2018 BETWEEN:
SRI. RAJENDRA S/O LATE YELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT. No.24, 1ST CROSS 17TH MAIN, VINAYAKANAGAR J.P. NAGAR, PUTTENAHALLI BENGALURU-560078.
(By Mr. SACHIN V.R. ADV.) AND:
1. SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR S/O LATE B.T. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT. No.2035, 2ND FLOOR 1ST CROSS, 17TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE INDIRANAGAR, BENGALURU-560038.
2. SMT. RENUKA W/O SRI. RAJENDRA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT. No.24, 1ST CROSS 17TH MAIN, VINAYAKANAGAR PUTTENHALLI, BANGALORE-560 078.
… PETITIONER … RESPONDENTS (By Mr. S.R. HEGDE HUDLAMANE, ADV., FOR C/R1 Mr. YOGEESHA N.C. ADV., FOR R2) - - -
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 01-09-2018 produced at Annexure-A passed in execution case No.484/2018 (in SC No.754/2014), by the Court of the III Addl. Judge and MACT, Bengaluru on IA filed under order XXI Rule 97 R/W Section 151 of CPC by the petitioner/objector on 08-06-2018, and consequently allow IA No.2 herewith produced as Annexure-C & etc.
These Petitions coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER Sri.Sachin V.R., learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri.S.R.Hegde Hudlamane, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. Learned counsel for the parties along with the parties are present.
3. Learned counsel for the parties have presented a compromise petition and have stated that the parties have compromised the matter on the terms and conditions mentioned in the compromise petition. The compromise petition is duly signed by the parties as well as the counsels and the parties who are present before this Court stated that they have understood the contents of the compromise petition and have signed the same.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, these petitions are disposed of on the terms and conditions contained in the compromise petition.
Sd/- JUDGE RV