IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.1612/2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
M/S. REDDY STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AT NO. 133/1, THE RESIDENCY RESIDENCY ROAD BANGALORE-560 025.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. BHASKAR REDDY. … PETITIONER (BY SRI B.S. RADHANANDAN., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT. JAYALAKSHMI D/O. LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT VITTASANDRA VILLAGE BEGUR HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU 2. SRI. JAYARAMA REDDY S/O. LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 3. SRI. SUNIL S/O. JAYARAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS 4. SRI. PRAVEEN S/O. JAYARAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS 5. SRI. MANJUNATH S/O. LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT HONGASANDRA VILLAGE BEGUR HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU 6. SRI. NAVEEN S/O. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS 7. MISS. NAVYA D/O. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS 8. LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY S/O. LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 9. MISS. RAMYA D/O. LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS 10. MASTER AKSHAY S/O. LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 AND 7 TO 11 ARE RESIDING AT DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI VILLAGE BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU.
11. JAYACHANDRA NAIDU S/O. NARAYANASWAMY NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1161/G-12 9TH CROSS, ASHOKNAGAR BANASHANKARI I STAGE II BLOCK, BENGALURU-560 050.
12. CHANDRASHEKAR NAIDU S/O. GURRAPPA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 37 ITTAMADU LAYOUT KEB ROAD, BSK III STAGE BENGALURU-560 085. … RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 09.11.2018 ON THE INTERIM APPLICATION FILED BY THE R1/THE PLAINITFF UNDER ORDER 6 RULE 17 OF CPC ON THE FILE OF XXX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, (CCH.NO.31) IN O.S.NO.6695/2011 AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The writ petition is disposed of as having been withdrawn in terms of memo with liberty to revive the same in the event the appeal stated to be pending against the order made under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC 1908 is reversed by the Appellate Court.
Sd/- JUDGE KTY