Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ravindra vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28308 of 2021 Applicant :- Ravindra Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Chandra Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Heard Sri Ramesh Chandra Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant- Ravindra with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.256 of 2021, registered under Sections 420, 379, 407, 411 I.P.C., Police Station Kharkhonda, District Meerut during pendency of the trial.
Allegation in the FIR is that the applicant and truck owner were unloading the goods, namely, clinker and filled the unloaded truck with rock/ashes.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to village rivalry as the applicant is Pradhan of that village. The applicant is not owner of the plot in question on which the disputed clinker had been unloaded. He next argued that the applicant is not owner of the vehicle in dispute. There is no independent witness of the alleged recovery. The applicant has no previous criminal antecedents and he is languishing in jail since 13.06.2021. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and co-operate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the mandate laid down by Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant, Ravindra, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
4. The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 12.8.2021 Nitin Verma
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ravindra vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 August, 2021
Judges
  • Deepak Verma
Advocates
  • Ramesh Chandra Yadav