Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5553 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ravindra Pal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harikesh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Heard Sri Harikesh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel.
This writ petition is preferred for seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no.2 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Bisalpur, District Pilibhit to decide Appeal no. T 2017125614024687, under Section 35(2) U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Virendra Pal and another Vs. Smt. Ganga Devi), within a stipulated period.
The learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending, it be disposed of by giving appropriate direction to the authority concerned.
The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no.2 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Bisalpur, District Pilibhit to consider and dispose of Appeal no. T 2017125614024687, under Section 35(2) U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Virendra Pal and another Vs. Smt. Ganga Devi), either on the next date fixed, but not later than 4 months.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertake that they shall not seek any adjournment and so also is expected from the private opposite parties in the pending case, except for strong and compelling reasons, else would attract an exemplary cost of not less than Rs.250/- payable to the other side.
It is clarified that the proceedings as far as possible should not be repeatedly adjourned, merely on the ground that the Presiding Officer is busy in administrative work.
Service of certified copy of this order upon the respondent concerned shall constitute sufficient notice upon him to submit a compliance report.
The authority concerned shall submit Compliance report in Chambers on 23.8.2018 at 4:00 P.M.
Order Date :- 26.2.2018/ N.S.Rathour