Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ravi vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29877 of 2019 Applicant :- Ravi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jaysingh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant in connection with Special Session Trial No.42 of 2018(Smt. Kusum Vs. Imrat @ Bhura and others), arising out of Complaint Case No.63 of 2015, under Sections 395, 397 IPC, P.S. Jakhlaun, District Lalitpur.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that he has been falsely implicated in the present case. Offence is triable by the Magistrate. He further submitted that the co- accused Imrat @ Bhura and three others having similar role, have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 27.8.2018 passed by the another Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 32537 of 2018. Lastly, he submitted that the applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 17.6.2019 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
Learned AGA has opposed the bail plea.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.
Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.
Let the applicant Ravi be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses.
iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court.
iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission.
v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 25.7.2019 Mini
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ravi vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 July, 2019
Judges
  • Ajit Singh
Advocates
  • Jaysingh Yadav