Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Rathnamma And Others vs Pyarejan And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|13 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA & SRI. M.N. UMASHANKAR, MEMBER BETWEEN 1. Smt. Rathnamma, M.F.A.No.3056/2015 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.382/2019) W/o late Manjunath @ Manju, Now aged about 31 years, 2. Swetha, D/o Late Manjunath @ Manju, Now aged about 17 years, 3. Sandeep, S/o Late Manjunath @ Manju, Now aged about 10 years, 4. Jayamma, W/o Chikkanna, Now aged about 54 years, 5. Chikkanna, W/o Late Chikkamuthayya, Now aged about 67 years, Appellant Nos.2 & 3 are since minors, Rep. by their natural guardian-mother, Appellant No.1, All are R/at. Colony, Byadarahalli, Thyamagondlu Hobli, Nelamangala Taluk, Bangalore Rural District – 562 123. ... Appellants (By Sri N.R.Rangegowda, Advocate) AND 1. Pyarejan S/o Abdul Khadar, Aged major, R/at. Heggere, S.S.M.C. Post, Tumkur Taluk, Tumkur District.
2. The Manager, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, No.89, 2nd Floor, SVR Complex, Hosur Main Road, Madivala, Bengaluru – 560 068, …Respondents (By Sri. A.M.Venkatesh, Advocate for R.2, v/o. 04.07.2016, notice to R.1 is d/w.) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 03.04.2014 PASSED IN MVC NO.6723/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE & XXXI ACMM, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.
CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants and the learned Counsel appearing for the Second Respondent - ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited along with its representative are present.
2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants (being authorized by the appellants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the Second respondent – Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The Appellants - Claimants have agreed to receive and the Second Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.4,25,000/- (Rupees Four Lakh Twenty-Five Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.
3. The Second Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.
4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made as per the Judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal.
5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.
Sd/- JUDGE Mkm* Sd/- MEMBER
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Rathnamma And Others vs Pyarejan And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
13 July, 2019
Judges
  • B Veerappa
  • Sri M N Umashankar