Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Rasik : vs State Of Tamil Nadu

Madras High Court|05 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J] The petitioner is the brother of the detenu-Thaibu, S/o.Jamal, aged about 27 years. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by his order in P.D.No.45/2016, dated 22.07.2016, holding him to be a "Drug Offender", as contemplated under Section 2(e) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.
2. Though a number of grounds have been raised assailing the order of detention, the learned counsel for the petitioner mainly relies on the following contention:-
There was denial of reasonable opportunity to challenge the order of detention in an effective manner by the non-supply of a copy of the extension of remand order by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil, though he made a representation to the Detaining Authority to furnish the same. Failure to supply a copy of the same even after a representation was made in writing seeking supply of the same amounts to denial of reasonable opportunity vitiating the order of detention itself.
3. The submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor in reply to the above said contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner are also heard.
4. In our considered opinion, the Detaining Authority, while relying upon the remand extension order, for clamping the order of detention as against the detenu, ought to have furnished a copy of the same. The failure to do so, in spite of making such representation, amounts to denial of reasonable opportunity to make an effective challenge to the order of detention. On that score alone, the order of detention is liable to be set aside.
5. In the result, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the impugned Detention Order, passed by the second respondent, in his proceedings in P.D.No.45/2016, dated 22.07.2016, is quashed. The detenu, namely Thaibu, S/o.Jamal, aged about 27 years, is ordered to be set at liberty forthwith, if he is not required for detention in connection with any other case.
To
1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.
2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Kanniyakumari District at Nagercoil, Nagercoil.
3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Madurai.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai..
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rasik : vs State Of Tamil Nadu

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 January, 2017