Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

R.Annalet Geetha vs D.Sabitha

Madras High Court|02 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that since the above writ petition was disposed of on the basis of T. RAJA,J.
vga the earlier orders passed in W.P. Nos.13931 of 2009, 13155, 13184 and 13196 of 2007 with a direction to the official respondents to regularise the services of the petitioners therein for the limited purpose of seniority and pension and not for any monetary benefits, the respondents by this time, ought to have disposed of the petitioners' representations.
2.Learned Special Government Pleader sought two weeks time.
3.If a direction is given to consider the case of the petitioners' representations on the basis of the earlier orders passed by this Court in the writ petitions mentioned supra, the same should be considered by the respondents within a specific time limit, which would only serve the purpose. Therefore, this Court, granting two weeks time, hereby directs the official respondents to consider the petitioners' representation on the basis of the earlier orders passed in W.P. Nos.13931 of 2009, 13155, 13184 and 13196 of 2007 dated 06.04.2011 and 22.07.2011.
4.With the above direction, this Contempt Petition stands disposed of.
02.01.2017 vga Contempt Petition No.2960 of 2016 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R.Annalet Geetha vs D.Sabitha

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
02 January, 2017