Court No. - 44
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5678 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ranjeeta Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amitabh Patel Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Amitabh Patel, the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned A.G.A. for the State and Mr. Sushil Kumar Chaturvedi, who has put in his appearance on behalf of the respondent Nos.2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the order dated 10.07.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.10, Agra in Criminal Appeal No.106 of 2018 (Sanjeev Kumar Satyarthi and others vs. State of U.P. and another), under Section 29 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
A Full Bench by this Court in the case of Dinesh Kumar Yadav vs. State of U.P. and another reported in 2016 (11) ADJ 29 has held that against an order passed by the Appellate Court in an appeal filed under Section 29 of the Act of 2005 of the aforesaid Act, a criminal revision shall lie, before the High Court.
In view of the above, the present application is not maintainable and is accordingly, dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Certified copy of the impugned order may be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining a photocopy of the same to be kept on record.
Order Date :- 20.8.2018 cks