Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ranjana Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 45
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20242 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ranjana Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhola Nath Yadav,Abhishek Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Diwakar Singh
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Sri Vinod Kumar Yadav holding brief of Sri Bhola Nath Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent no. 7 has been appointed as fair price shop dealer of the village panchayat Sultanpur @ Lodhideeh, District Allahabad. The cause of action of this writ petition does not survive, and a fresh cause of action has arisen. This writ petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition on the fresh cause of action.
Order Date :- 29.5.2018 Pratima
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ranjana Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2018
Judges
  • Ajay Bhanot
Advocates
  • Bhola Nath Yadav Abhishek Kumar Yadav