Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Rani Gaur vs State Of U P & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 35826 of 2004 Petitioner :- Smt. Rani Gaur Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.N.Pandey,Havaldar Verma,R.B. Singhal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mahendra Pratap
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Sri Havaldar Verma, Advocate, states that he has no instructions in the matter. No other counsel has appeared on behalf of petitioner to press this writ petition despite having been called in revise. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief: "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 11.08.2004 (Annexure No. 4 to the instant writ petition) passed by respondent no. 3."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also relief sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 Siddhant Sahu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Rani Gaur vs State Of U P & Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 August, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • S N Pandey Havaldar Verma R B Singhal