Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ramu Ram Maurya vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23302 of 2021 Petitioner :- Ramu Ram Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girja Shanker Mishra,Pratiksha Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State.
This writ petition has been filed seeking direction for restraining the private respondents from entering upon the land of petitioner.
It is contended that the land in dispute is an abadi land and private respondents are trying to encroach upon the said land.
As the relief sought in the writ petition is against the private respondents, writ petition is not maintainable. However, in case, petitioner wants to seek any relief, he may approach the authority concerned by invoking Section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
Writ petition is dismissed, accordingly.
Order Date :- 20.9.2021 Shekhar Digitally signed by ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL Date: 2021.09.21 10:15:09 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ramu Ram Maurya vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 September, 2021
Judges
  • Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Advocates
  • Girja Shanker Mishra Pratiksha Rai