Court No. - 22
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1804 of 2018 Applicant :- Ramautar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rama Shanker Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Rama Shanker Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Zafeer Ahmad, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the applicant, complainant and injured are the real brothers and between them some dispute is running with regard to some property and complainant has obtained sale deed of the land in question and eloped the share of the present applicant and when the applicant had objected for the same then present F.I.R. has been lodged against the applicant only to put pressure, the said fact has been mentioned in para 9 of the affidavit accompanying this bail application. It is further submitted that the recovery of 315 bore Tamancha which has been shown from the applicant is false. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 15.10.2017. It has been pointed out that the applicant has criminal history which has been duly explained in paragraph no.16 of the affidavit accompanying the bail application.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Ramautar involved in Case Crime No.2351 of 2017, under Section 307, Police Station Roja, District Shahjahanpur be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 25.4.2018 Dev/-