Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Milan And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|06 January, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 288 of 2021 Applicant :- Ram Milan And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shiv Raj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to enlarge them on bail in Case Crime No. 252 of 2020, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti- Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Chaubiya, District Etawah.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is also contended by learned counsel for the applicants that in the gang chart one case has been shown against the applicant no. 1 and two other cases have been shown against the applicant no. 2 in which applicants have been enlarged on bail. The bail orders are on record as Annexure-3 to the bail application. There is no possibility of the applicants of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicants are enlarged on bail, the applicants shall not misuse the liberty of bail. It is next contended that the applicants are languishing in jail since 20.11.2020.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicants by contending that there is no reason to falsely implicate the applicants, therefore, they do not deserve any benevolence. In case, the applicants are released on bail, they shall again indulge in similar activities and shall misuse the liberty of bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicants are entitled for bail.
Let the applicant no. 1 Ram Milan and applicant no. 2 Rohit alias Baldhari involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions :-
1. The applicants will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. They shall not tamper with the witnesses.
3. They shall not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
4. The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad.
5. The concerned Court shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court, Allahabad.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
Order Date :- 6.1.2021 Puspendra
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Milan And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
06 January, 2021
Judges
  • Pankaj Bhatia
Advocates
  • Shiv Raj Singh