Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Bharose Lal vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32892 of 2021 Petitioner :- Ram Bharose Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shahnawaz Akhtar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mukesh Kumar Singh Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
The petitioner being aggrieved by provisional assessment notice dated 25.9.2021 issued by respondent no.2 under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has preferred the instant writ petition.
The sole submission is that the objection of the petitioner against the said notice has not been decided so far.
Learned counsel for the respondent Corporation states that in case final assessment order has not been passed till date, the respondent Corporation will decide the objection.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by providing that in case final assessment order has yet not been passed, the third respondent shall take into consideration the objections filed by the petitioner before passing the final assessment order.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Order Date :- 17.12.2021 SL
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Bharose Lal vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 December, 2021
Judges
  • Manoj Kumar Gupta
Advocates
  • Shahnawaz Akhtar