Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ram Bali vs Ashutosh And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27508 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ram Bali Respondent :- Ashutosh And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Tarun Varma,Jitendra Shankar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Harish Kumar Tripathi,Tariq Maqbool Khan
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
Challenge in this writ petition is to the orders passed on an application under Section 28 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act for correction of map and the order dismissing the consequential appeal under Section 210 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act.
The writ petition has been filed stating that the proceedings under Section 210 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act were titled as a revision and since a second revision petition is not maintainable, the instant writ petition has been filed.
The provisions of Section 210 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act provides for an appeal. Merely because it was wrongly titled as a revision, the same will not make it a revision.
Under the circumstances, the petitioner has a statutory alternative remedy under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act which has not been availed by him.
The writ petition is therefore, dismissed on the ground of availability of an alternative statutory remedy.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 sweta
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ram Bali vs Ashutosh And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Anjani Kumar Mishra
Advocates
  • Tarun Varma Jitendra Shankar Pandey