Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Raju Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2196 of 2019 Petitioner :- Raju Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Preet Pal Singh Rathore Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel.
This petition has been preferred for the respondents being commanded to measure the height of the petitioner denovo.
Undisputedly pursuant to the recruitment exercise initiated in terms of Rule 15, the petitioner was submitted to a physical examination and in which he was found not to fulfill the minimum stipulation which was fixed. Although the statute contemplates and confers a right upon the petitioner to prefer an appeal, no such appeal was admittedly preferred and filed by the petitioner. The height measurement reports are neither established to be arbitrary nor are they assailed on malafides. The examination at the stage of Rule 15 is undisputedly carried out with the aid of standardised equipment.
Consequently and bearing in mind the principles enunciated by the Division Bench of this Court in State of U.P. Vs. Rahul [2016 (3) ADJ 327], this writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 25.2.2019 LA/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raju Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 February, 2019
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Preet Pal Singh Rathore