Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Raju vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33072 of 2014 Applicant :- Raju Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shiva Tripathi,Siddhartha Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Nitin Gupta Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. This is a bail application pending since 2014. Called in revise. None appeared to press it. Learned A.G.A. is present for State. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. It appears that either trial has concluded or applicant has lost interest for any other reason and that's why none is present to press it. Therefore, by efflux of time, this application has rendered infructuous.
3. Dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 25.2.2019 KA
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raju vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Shiva Tripathi Siddhartha Srivastava