Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Rajeev vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15461 of 2016 Applicant :- Rajeev Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Pradyumn Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicant, and learned A.G.A. for State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by accused applicant for enlarging him on bail in Case Crime No. 33 of 2015, under Sections 302 I.P.C., Police Station Quarsi, District Aligarh.
3. The applicant is named in the First Information Report and Informant, who is eye witness, has supported the F.I.R. version in the statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and reason of death stated in F.I.R. is also corroborated by the medical report. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail.
4. Application is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 29.5.2019 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rajeev vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Pradyumn Kumar