Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Raj Nath Shukla vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12963 of 2018 Petitioner :- Raj Nath Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
Heard Shri Harish Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Hare Ram Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
The petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondents to pay him gratuity with interest.
The petitioner is stated to have retired from service on 09.05.2011 in the Hindalco Industries Limited, Renu Sagar Power Division, District Sonbhadra Counsel for the petitioner has not been able to state as to how the Hindalco Industries Limited falls within the definition of 'State'. Hindalco Industries Limited is a private industry and does not have any attribute of State.
For reasons aforesaid, the writ petition is not maintainable in the High Court and is accordingly dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 29.5.2018 N Tiwari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raj Nath Shukla vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2018
Judges
  • B Amit Sthalekar
Advocates
  • Harish Pratap Singh