Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Raghunath And Others vs The Civil Judge

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 40
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9711 of 2019 Petitioner :- Raghunath And 2 Others Respondent :- The Civil Judge (S.D.) Siddharth Nagar And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjai Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Mishra
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The petitioners had filed a suit for partition which was accompanied by an application for temporary injunction. The grievance of the petitioners is that the temporary injunction application is not being decided.
The order sheet also reveals that a substitution application is pending.
Under such circumstances, it is being directed that the substitution application be decided within a period of one week from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order and thereafter orders be passed on the temporary injunction application within two weeks thereafter.
With these observations, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 17.12.2019 GS (Siddhartha Varma, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raghunath And Others vs The Civil Judge

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 December, 2019
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Sanjai Kumar Pandey