IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.727/2006 BETWEEN:
1. PUTTATHIMMEGOWDA S/O HANUMANTHEGOWDA AGE 36, R/AT BAGESHPUR VILLAGE GANDSI HOBLI ARSIKERE TALUK-573 103.
2. VENKATASWAMY S/O HANUMANTHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT BAGESHPUR VILLAGE GANDSI HOBLI ARSIKERE TALUK-573 103.
... APPELLANTS (BY SMT. SONA VAKKUND, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND:
1. HANUMEGOWDA S/O HANUMANTHEGOWDA AGE 54 YEARS, R/AT BAGESHPUR VILLAGE GANDSI HOBLI ARSIKERE TALUK-573 103.
2. MANJUNATH S/O HANUMANTHEGOWDA AGE 46, R/AT BAGESHPUR VILLAGE GANDSI HOBLI ARSIKERE TALUK-573 103.
3. GOVINDEGOWDA S/O HANUMANTHEGOWDA AGE 38 R/AT BAGESHPUR VILLAGE GANDSI HOBLI ARSIKERE TALUK-573 103.
4. HANUMANTHEGOWDA SINCE DEAD REP. BY LRS. APPELLANTS NOs. R1 TO R3 5. HONNAMMA SINCE DEAD REP. BY LRS. APPELLANTS NOs.R1 TO R3 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI CHETHAN B, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) THIS RFA IS FILED U/S.96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT.21.12.2005 PASSED IN O.S.NO.5/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN), ARSIKERE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Counsel for the appellants absent. No representation. The matter is of the year 2006 in terms of Regular First Appeal and is of the year 2000 in terms of the Original Suit. This appeal is listed for final hearing. There are no grounds to adjourn the matter. It appears that the appellants have no interest in prosecuting the appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE VK