Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Puspum vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep.By

Madras High Court|08 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

There has been no representation for the petitioner, during the earlier hearings on 07.07.2017, 12.07.2017, 14.07.2017 and 01.09.2017 as well as today.
2. Today, the matter has been listed under the caption "For dismissal" and again there was no representation, when the matter was called at 2.42pm and 3.50pm.
3. Hence the matter is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently connected W.P.M.P is closed.
1. The Secretary to Government The Government of Tamil Nadu Commercial Taxes and Religious Endownment Department, Chennai -9.
P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.
jer
2. The District Collector Tuticorin District Tuticorin.
3. The Inspector General of Registration Santhome High Road Chennai.
4. The Sub-Registrar Puthukottai Sub-Registration Office Tuticorin District.
W.P.No.17964 of 2004 And W.P.M.P.No.21364 of 2004 08.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Puspum vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep.By

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
08 September, 2017