Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Pushpendra Kumar Chaudhary vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|18 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41740 of 2018 Petitioner :- Pushpendra Kumar Chaudhary Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Baleshwar Chaturvedi
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
The petitioner is aggrieved by the provisional assessment of electricity dues vide assessment order dated 19.1.2018 of the Executive Engineer Vidut Vitran Khand Chaturth Dakshinachal Vidut Vitran Nigam Limited, Hathras.
The petitioner against the aforesaid provisional assessment has a remedy of filing objections whereupon final assessment will be done and against the final assessment if he is aggrieved, he may prefer an appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
In view of the above alternative remedies available to the petitioner, it is not proper for this Court to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction. Moreover, the petitioner has also filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the respodnents from recovering the electricity dues as per the aforesaid provisional assessment.
Accordingly, we decline to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction and the petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 18.12.2018 SKS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pushpendra Kumar Chaudhary vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
18 December, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Arvind Kumar Tiwari