IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.628 OF 2017 BETWEEN Smt. Pullamma, D/o. Late Papaiah, W/o. Late Muniyappa, Aged about 90 years, R/at No.127, Thubrahalli, Varthur Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk (presently Bengaluru East Taluk) Bengaluru – 560 066.
…Appellant (By Sri.Vijay Shekara Gowda V, Advocate-absent) AND 1. Sri. Nagaraj S/o Muniswamappa aged about 60 years 2. Smt. M. Sampangamma w/o Sri Nagaraj aged about 50 years 3. Smt. M.Bhagirathi w/o & D/o not known aged about 45 years Respondents 1 to 3 are r/at No.11, Thobrahalli village, Bengaluru South Taluk (presently Bengaluru East Taluk) Bengaluru-560 066.
4. The Assistant Commissioner Presently Executive Officer Taluk Panchayath (Taluk Gram Panchayath) Banashankari Bengaluru South Taluk Bengaluru – 560 082 (Respondent no.4 deleted) …Respondents This RFA is filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC, against the judgment and decree dated 20.10.2009 passed in O.S.No.4592/2003 on the file of the IX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, partly decreeing the suit for mandatory injunction and permanent injunction.
This RFA coming on for further orders, this day, the Court made the following :
ORDER Appellant’s counsel is absent. The order dated 18.06.2018 shows that two weeks time was granted to the appellant for complying with office objections. Cost was also imposed. The office objections have not been removed and cost has not been paid. Therefore the order dated 18.06.2018 comes into effect. Appeal is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE sd