Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15906 of 2017 Petitioner :- Smt. Prema Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anjali Upadhya
Hon'ble Krishna Murari,J. Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Kakkar,J.
Sri B. B. Johari, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents.
Admittedly, the petitioner had not challenged the acquisition proceedings but claims that he is entitled for allotment of 10% developed land in view of the decision of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Gajraj and others Vs. State of U. P. and others, 2011 (11) ADJ 1 and the directions contained therein.
The controversy as to whether a tenure holder who has not challenged the acquisition proceedings is entitled to claim 10% developed land in view of directions in the case of Gajraj and others (supra) stands decided by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Mange @ Mange Ram Vs. State of U. P. and others in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 7521 of 2016 vide judgement and order dated 1.8.2016 and other connected writ petitions. The said decision is squarely covered in this writ petition and for the reasons mentioned therein the present petitioner is not entitled to be granted any relief.
The writ petition, accordingly, stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 17.4.2017 AKT