Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Shri Prem Chand Grag vs Central Bureau Of Investigation

High Court Of Karnataka|12 March, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.4418 OF 2014 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SHRI. PREM CHAND GRAG, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O. SHRI HARNARAIN AGGARWAL, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. SHRI LAL MAHAL LIMITED, B-16, BHAGAWAN DAS NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110 026.
BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SMT.ANITA GARG, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. RAJENDRA, ADV. - ABSENT) AND:
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, BENGALURU, NO.36, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 032.
REPRESENTED BY THE ADDL SP, CBI:BS&FC:BENGALURU. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. P PRASANNA KUMAR, ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED TRIAL COURT DATED 30.11.2013 VIDE ANN-AD DIRECTING ISSUE OF OPEN ENDED NON BAILABLE WARRANT AND FURTHER COERCIVE STEPS, THERETO, INCLUDING LOOK OUT CIRCULAR, IF ANY AGAINST THE PETITIONER AS BEING VIOLATIVE OF INTER ALIA ART. 14 & 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R None for the petitioner. Sri. P. Prasanna Kumar, learned counsel for respondent.
2. Learned counsel for respondent submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous on account of efflux of time.
3. The aforesaid submission is taken on record.
Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE RD
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shri Prem Chand Grag vs Central Bureau Of Investigation

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
12 March, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe