Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Pramod Kumar vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14949 of 2019 Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-Respondents.
The petitioner claims that he is working as Chowkidar in I.T.I. since 2010. As per impugned order as well as letter of appointment of the petitioner, the petitioner has been engaged in I.T.I through service provider called I.M.C. The said appointment of the petitioner being through a service provider, writ petition against the service provider is not maintainable.
Since the petitioner is seeking violation of contractual obligation, he may approach appropriate forum for its redressal of his grievance.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 26.9.2019
RPD
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pramod Kumar vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 September, 2019
Judges
  • Abhinava Upadhya
Advocates
  • Santosh Kumar Mishra