Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Pradeep Tiwari And Others vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 79
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 26630 of 2021 Applicant :- Pradeep Tiwari And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dheeraj Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A and perused the record.
The present application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the charge-sheet dated 15.04.2019 filed in NCR No.44 of 2019, under Section 427 I.P.C., Police Station Chakeri, District Kanpur.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the offences, under section 427 I.P.C. is non cognizable offence, therefore, the charge sheet filed by the Investigating Officer cannot proceed as a police case and the same is liable to be proceeded with as a complaint case. Learned counsel for the applicant has placed reliance on Murli and others Vs. State of U.P. and another, 2008 (61) ACC 54, Virendra Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2002 (45) ACC 609 and Shakila Bano and others Vs. State of U.P. and another, 2008 (61) ACC 636.
According to the first Schedule to the Code of Criminal Procedure, the offences, under Section 427 I.P.C. is non cognizable, therefore, the Explanation to Section 2(d) Cr.P.C., is attracted in this case. Section 2(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides:
"(d) "Complaint" means any allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Code, that some person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does not include a police report."
Explanation- A report made by a police officer in a case, which discloses, after investigation, the commission of a non- cognizable offence shall be deemed a complaint and the police officer by whom such report is made shall be deemed to be the complainant.
After considering the rival arguments and perusal of record, I am of the considered view that the impugned order is not in accordance with above referred provision of Section 2 (d) Cr.P.C. In view of above, it is wrong, illegal and not sustainable in the eyes of law.
In view of above, application (u/s 482 Cr.P.C.) is allowed. Matter is remanded back to the Court below for passing appropriate order on the report filed by the Investigating Officer, in accordance with law, in the light of observations made above, after hearing the necessary parties, except the applicants who are proposed accused.
Office is directed to communicate this order to C.J.M., concerned for necessary compliance, forthwith.
Order Date :- 20.12.2021 Amit/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pradeep Tiwari And Others vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2021
Judges
  • Rajeev Singh
Advocates
  • Dheeraj Kumar Dwivedi