Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Pavithra And Others vs A B Chandradhara And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|13 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA & SRI. M.N. UMASHANKAR, MEMBER M.F.A.No.1287/2018 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.2388/2019) BETWEEN 1. Smt. Pavithra, W/o Late G. Harish, Aged about 26 years, 2. Kumari Varshini, D/o Late G. Harish, Aged about 06 years, 3. Smt. Ammaiah, W/o Giriyappa, Aged about 57 years, 4. Giriyappa, S/o Late Thimmaiah, Aged about 72 years, All are R/at Ward No.40, Behind Mudalagiri, Thimmappa Temple, Doddagollarahatti, Magadi Road, Vishwaneedam Post, Bengaluru - 91.
Since petitioner No.2 is minor Reptd. by her mother & natural Guardian Smt. R. Pavithra ... Appellants (By Sri. Shripad V. Shastri, Advocate) AND 1. A.B. Chandradhara, S/o Late Byrabasappa, R/at Attimgere Village & Post, Magadi Taluk, Dasarahalli, Ramanagar District - 572 511.
(RC Owner of Car bearing Reg. No.KA-42-M-7021) 2. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd., No.89, SVR Complex, Hosur Main Road, Madivala, Bengaluru - 68.
(IP No.3001/MI/0302361/00/000 Valid from 04.09.2015 to 03.09.2016) …Respondents (By Sri. H.N. Keshava Prashanth, Advocate for R.2) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 07.06.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.1066/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE XXI ACMM & XXIII ASCJ, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.
CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants and the learned Counsel appearing for the second Respondent - ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited along with its representative are present.
2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint Memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants (being authorized by the appellants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the second respondent – Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The Appellants -Claimants have agreed to receive and the second Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.6,46,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Forty-six Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.
3. The second respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.
4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made as per the ratio adopted by the Claims Tribunal 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER LL
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Pavithra And Others vs A B Chandradhara And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
13 July, 2019
Judges
  • B Veerappa
  • Sri M N Umashankar