(Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA) Against the measures taken under Section 13(4) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement Security Interest Act, 2002, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the said Act, which was disposed of. Subsequently, the petitioner gave an offer to the bank and the same having failed, the bank has issued the impugned advertisement in proclamation of sale on 11.4.2010. In the aforesaid background, if the petitioner has grievance against the impugned notice dated 11.4.2010, he may move the before the Debts Recovery Tribunal for the fresh cause of action and may also ask for the interim relief. The application stands disposed of.
[S.J.
MUKHOPADHAYA, CJ.] [AKIL KURESHI, J.] sundar/-
Top