1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2013
  6. /
  7. January

Pannaben vs The Present

High Court Of Gujarat|18 October, 2013
On last two occasions, when the matter was called out, learned advocate for the opponent was not present. Today also, when the matter is called out, learned advocate for the applicant is present but the learned advocate for the opponent is not present. Heard learned advocate Mr.Bhatt for the applicant.
The present applicant is wife of respondent who has filed H.M.P.No.515 of 2013 before the Principal Family Judge, Anand under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for obtaining decree of restitution of conjugal rights. The present applicant is residing at village Nava Shatruda, Taluka Mahemdavad, Distict Kheda with her parents, she is illiterate lady and the distance from Mahemdavad is 50 kms. from Anand and inconvenience will be caused to her to attend the Court at Anand. Further, as per the submission of learned advocate for the applicant, the present applicant has filed H.M.P.No.135 of 2013 under Section 13 of the H.M.Act for divorce in Nadiad Court.
Considering these facts, this application is allowed. H.M.Petition No.515 of 2013 is transferred from the Court of learned Family Court, Anand to the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Civil Court, Nadiad.
(M.D.SHAH, J.) Srilatha Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
  • M D Shah