Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40022 of 2020 Applicant :- Padam Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Bahadur Shivhare Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA- I, for the State and perused the material brought on record.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case due to enmity. The applicants have not committed the alleged offence. There is no independent witness of the alleged incident. It is next contended that the ingredients of offences are absent and entire prosecution story is based on false and frivolous allegations. It is next contended that it is a cross case in which both sides have received injuries and at this stage it cannot be said as to who was aggressor and the incident had taken place at the spur of the moment. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It is further submitted that applicants have no previous criminal history and there is also no possibility of applicanst either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Applicants are in jail since 10.9.2020, and undertake that they will not misuse the liberty, if granted.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail prayer of the applicants without disputing the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the applicants and submitted that in case applicants are released on bail they will misuse the liberty of bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicants- Padam Singh and Badri Prasad, be released on bail in Case Crime No. 173 of 2020, under Sections - 324, 307, 504 IPC, Police Station- Biwar, District- Hamirpur, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-
1. The applicants will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. They will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. They will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicants to prison.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad. The concerned Court shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court, Allahabad.
Order Date :- 6.1.2021 ssm