Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Pachaiappan vs Prakash

Madras High Court|02 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 01.06.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 02.06.2017 i.e., today, under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
02.06.2017 kj To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Harur, Dharmapuri District.
2.The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by the District Collector, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District.
3.The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Kadathur Post, Pappireddipatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District.
4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Pappireddipatti Taluk & Post, Dharmapuri District.
5. The Village Administrative Officer, Chinthalpadi Post, Palppireddipatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District.
V.M.VELUMANI, J.
kj C.R.P.(PD)No.849 of 2014 & M.P.No.1 of 2014 02.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pachaiappan vs Prakash

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
02 June, 2017