IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B MANOHAR REVIEW PETITION NO.346/2016 IN RFA No.369/2014 BETWEEN:
1. SMT P C RUKMANIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O SRI. B. NAGARAJU (SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) 2. SRI B NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O LATE BYRAPPA (SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) BOTH RESIDING AT NO.81, PEDDAPALLI VILLAGE & POST, KGF, BANGARPET TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563101 ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI.GAURAV MANDAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.S R KRISHNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. KARMIKARA RAITHARA VASATHI NIRMANA SAHAKARA SANGHA LTD., A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.92 1ST FLOOR, BULL TEMPLE ROAD BANGALORE-560018 2. N V SRIDAHARA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS S/O LATE VENKATA DASAPPA PRESIDENT, KARMIKARA RAITHARA VASATHI NIRMANA SAHAKARA SANGHA LTD., NO.92, 1ST FLOOR, BULL TEMPLE ROAD BANGALORE-560018 3. B G VISHWESHWARAIAH MAJOR IN AGE, SECRETARY, KARMIKARA RAITHARA VASATHI NIRMANA SAHAKARA SANGHA LTD., NO.92, 1ST FLOOR, BULL TEMPLE ROAD BANGALORE-560018 4. C K RAGHAVENDRA RAO MAJOR IN AGE, TREASURER KARMIKARA RAITHARA VASATHI NIRMANA SAHAKARA SANGHA LTD., NO.92, 1ST FLOOR, BULL TEMPLE ROAD BANGALORE-560018 5. SMT SHYAMALA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS W/O M SRINIVAS 6. M SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O MUNISWAMY BOTH R/A NO.891, 3RD CROSS, ASHOKNAGAR, 2ND BLOCK, BSK 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE-50 ...RESPONDENTS THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED:20/11/2015 PASSED IN RFA NO. 369/2014, ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JAYANT PATEL J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Earlier this Court on 13.1.2017 had passed the following order:
“Learned counsel for the review petitioners seeks time to produce memorandum of SLP.”
2. Thereafter, on 10.2.2017, the following order was passed:
“Mr.N.Thejesh, learned counsel states that his senior is not in station and he seeks time.
Hence, adjourned.”
3. Again on 3.3.2017, on memo, the matter was adjourned. Today when the matter is taken up by the special Bench, Mr.Gaurav Mandappa, learned counsel states that his senior is not keeping well. Even otherwise also, the SLP against the very order has been dismissed.
4. Under the circumstances, dismissed for default.
I.A.1/16 with I.A.2/16 would not survive for consideration and they also stand dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE Sk/-