Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Omkar And Others vs State Of Up And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 31
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36624 of 2018 Applicant :- Omkar And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of Up And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Pal Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Vijay Lakshmi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the records.
The applicants, by means of this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.109 of 2014, (State Vs. Omkar and Others), arising out of N.C.R. No.106 of 2013, dated 05.11.2013, under Sections 323,504 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Mandawali, District-Bijnor, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate,Najibabad, District- Bijnor.
The contention of learned counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. Learned counsel pointed out towards certain documents and statements in support of his contention.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application by contending that all the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Considered the rival submissions made by the parties.
The submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants calls for adjudication on pure questions of fact, which may be adequately adjudicated upon only by the trial court and while doing so even the submissions made on points of law can also be more appropriately gone into by the trial court in this case.
At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192, Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283 and the recent being A.R.C.J. Vs. Nimra Cerglass Technics (P) Ltd. (2016) 1 SCC 348.
Therefore, this Court does not deem it proper and cannot be persuaded to have a pre-trial before the actual trial begins. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage.Moreover, the applicants have got a right of discharge by moving a proper application for the said purpose before the trial court and they are free to make all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court including those which have been canvassed by them before this Court in this application.
Accordingly the prayer for quashing the proceedings of the aforementioned case is refused.
At this juncture learned counsel for the applicants prayed that the applicants are ready to surrender before the court and to move bail applications but they may be granted a time of 30 days for surrender and the court below be directed to consider their bail applications expeditiously in accordance with the law as laid down by this Court in the Full Bench decision of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., 2005 CriLj 755 and affirmed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. 2009 (4) SCC, 437.
Learned A.G.A. has no objection against the aforesaid prayer.
As the law laid down in both the aforesaid cases, should be complied with in letter and spirit, by all courts, it is expected from the trial court that in case the applicants surrender before it within 30 days from today and apply for bail, it will decide their bail applications in wake of the law laid down by this Court in the Full Bench decision of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., 2005 CriLj 755 and affirmed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. 2009 (4) SCC, 437.
For a period of 30 days from today which shall not be extended any further, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants, in the above mentioned case.
With the aforesaid directions this application is finally disposed off.
Order Date :- 27.10.2018 SB
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Omkar And Others vs State Of Up And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 October, 2018
Judges
  • S Vijay Lakshmi
Advocates
  • Jitendra Pal Singh Chauhan