Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Neeraj vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33919 of 2019 Applicant :- Neeraj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shrawan Kumar Pandey,Shobh Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant in connection with Case Crime No.99 of 2019, under Sections 395, 412 IPC, P.S. Railway Road, District Meerut.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case and he was not named in the FIR. It is further contended that nothing incriminating article or material has been recovered either from the applicant or on his pointing out. It is further contended that the recovery which has been shown from the applicant was false one. Offence is triable by the Magistrate. He further submitted that the co-accused Mohit Goel @ Sonu @ Jhakoi, Ankit Garg, Ashu Jain, Talib and Rahul having similar role, have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 22.7.2019, 24.7.2019, 26.7.2019, 30.7.2019 and 6.8.2019 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 29157 of 2019, 29689 of 2019, 30058 of 2019, 30303 of 2019, 31857 of 2019. It is further contended that the criminal history of the applicant has been properly explained in para 12 of the bail application. Lastly, he submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 16.5.2019 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
Learned AGA has opposed the bail plea.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.
Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.
Let the applicant Neeraj be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses.
iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court.
iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission.
v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 21.8.2019 Mini
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Neeraj vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 August, 2019
Judges
  • Ajit Singh
Advocates
  • Shrawan Kumar Pandey Shobh Nath Pandey