Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Neeraj Shreshtha vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24681 of 2018 Applicant :- Neeraj Shreshtha Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava,Bhaju Ram Pprasad Sharma,Vipin Chandra Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ashish Pandey
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. While parity has been claimed by the applicant with co- accused Rajesh Nigam, who has been enlarged on bail by this Court, learned counsel for the informant would submit that the applicant is the citizen of Nepal and if enlarged on bail, he is likely to avoid the trial. In that regard, it has been submitted, even at present, the applicant is not cooperating in the trial proceedings inasmuch as cross-examination of PW-2 has been delayed solely by the applicant.
2. In view of the above before the present bail application is decided, it is desirable that a certified copy of the ordersheet of the learned trial court may be produced.
3. List on 02.01.2020, on which date, learned counsel for the informant may bring on record, a certified copy of the ordersheet indicating the conduct being offered by the applicant.
Order Date :- 17.12.2019 Abhilash
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Neeraj Shreshtha vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 December, 2019
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Arvind Kumar Srivastava Bhaju Ram Pprasad Sharma Vipin Chandra Pal