Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Neeraj Kumar Singh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|16 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 19411 of 2021 Applicant :- Neeraj Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Madan Mohan Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Ref: Crl. Misc. Correction Application
Heard Mr. Vikrant Rana, learned counsel for informant- applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
This correction application has been filed on behalf of informant seeking correction in the order dated 14.12.2021 with the prayer that even though informant has put in appearance through Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate, however, his name is not mentioned in paragraph-1 of order dated 14.12.2021.
Record shows that vakalatnama of Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate is already on record.
Accordingly, paragraph-1 of order dated 14.12.2021 shall be read as follows:
"Heard Mr. Madan Mohan Srivastava, learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. representing opposite party-1 and Mr. Vikrant Rana, learned counsel representing informant."
This correction shall form part of earlier order dated 14.12.2021.
With the aforesaid directions, this correction application stands finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 16.12.2021 Saif
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Neeraj Kumar Singh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
16 December, 2021
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Madan Mohan Srivastava