Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Nagamma And Others vs H N Channegowda And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|13 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7987 OF 2016 BETWEEN 1. SMT. NAGAMMA, W/O KARISIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 2. KARISIDDEGOWDA, S/O LATE BOREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3. SURESHA, S/O KARISIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT M. HOSAHALLY VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK AND DISTRICT.
.. APPELLANTS (BY SRI. BUSHANI KUMAR AND SRI. K.N. SUDHEER, ADVOCTES) AND 1. H.N. CHANNEGOWDA, S/O NINGEGOWDA, R/AT M. HOSAHALLY VILLAGE, DUDDA HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT.
2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., NO.1576, FIRST FLOOR, V.V. ROAD, MANDYA CITY.
…RESPONDENTS This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 173(1) of MV ACT against the Judgment and Award dated 05/09/2014 passed in MVC No.108/2010 on the file of the PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, MANDYA, dismissing the claim petition for compensation.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R The learned counsel for the appellant is granted three weeks time to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed automatically without reference to the Court.
Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.22.08.2017, Office objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
T By: DS R By: AV COPY C By: KTY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Nagamma And Others vs H N Channegowda And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
13 August, 2019
Judges
  • Raghvendra S Chauhan Miscellaneous