Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Munawwar And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|05 September, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33702 of 2018 Applicant :- Munawwar And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mirza Ali Zulfaqar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Mirza Ali Zulfaqar, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Ravi Sigh Parihar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is further submitted that the dispute between the parties has been compromise, a copy of which has been annexed as annexure-7 to the affidavit accompanying this bail application. It is next contended that the co-accused namely Farzand and Mehfooz have already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 16.8.2018 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.30993 of 2018, a copy of said order has been produced by the learned counsel for the applicants today in the Court which is taken on record. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicants have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicants that they are ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make themselves available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicants are languishing in jail since 17.7.2018. It has been pointed out that the applicants have no criminal history.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment the applicants are entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicants Munawwar and Waseem involved in Case Crime No.548 of 2018, under Sections 452, 307, 324, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Civil Lines, District Rampur be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.
1. The applicants will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. They will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. They will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 5.9.2018 Dev/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Munawwar And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
05 September, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Mirza Ali Zulfaqar