Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Mukeem vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20614 of 2018 Applicant :- Mukeem Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Gupta,Pankaj Kumar Tyagi,Vandana Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pankaj Kumar Srivastva,Sanjay Singh
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that in the F.I.R. general allegation has been made against the applicant and his other family members that they were demanding additional dowry from the victim and her parents and on account of non fulfilment of the demand of additional dowry, the victim was tortured and maltreated by them in her matrimonial home. He further submitted the applicant is father-in-law of the victim. He is absolutely innocent and having no concern with the alleged demand of additional dowry or maltreatment and he has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. He lastly submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 11.3.2018.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Let the applicant Mukeem involved in Case Crime No. 57 of 2017, under Sections 498A, 323, 504 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, district-Aligarh be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 21.8.2018 Faridul
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mukeem vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 August, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Ashutosh Gupta Pankaj Kumar Tyagi Vandana Gupta