Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7599 of 2018 Petitioner :- Mr. Mohammad Hashim Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Revenue Secretary U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Omkar Nath Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Heard Sri Omkar Nath Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel.
It is submitted that ends of justice would be met if any appropriate direction is issued to respondent no.2 /Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tamkuhiraj District Kushi Nagar, to execute the order 13.3.2013 in Case No.110/2013 (Mohammad Hashim vs. Mohammddin and others) under Section 41 of U.P. Land Revenue Act expeditiously preferably within a stipulated period.
The learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending, it be disposed of by giving appropriate direction to the authority concerned.
The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no.2 /Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tamkuhiraj District Kushi Nagar, to execute the order 13.3.2013 in Case No.110/2013 (Mohammad Hashim vs. Mohammddin and others) under Section 41 of U.P. Land Revenue Act expeditiously preferably within 3 months from the date of production of certified copy of this order to its logical conclusion.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall not seek any adjournment and so also is expected from the private opposite parties, except for strong and compelling reasons, else would attract an exemplary cost of not less than Rs.250/- payable to the other side.
It is clarified that the proceedings as far as possible should not be repeatedly adjourned, merely on the ground that the Presiding Officer is busy in administrative work.
Service of certified copy of this order upon the respondent concerned shall constitute sufficient notice upon him to submit a compliance report.
The authority concerned shall submit Compliance report in Chambers on 25.7.018 at 4:00 P.M.
Order Date :- 26.2.2018 RS