Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mohammad Arif And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20747 of 2019 Petitioner :- Mohammad Arif And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravindra Nath Yadav,Akhilesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A.
The petitioners seek a writ of mandamus restraining the respondent from causing any harassment. We are of the considered view that applicant should move before the authority concerned. The writ petition is not maintainable.
The writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Order Date :- 26.9.2019 Vibha Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohammad Arif And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 September, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Ravindra Nath Yadav Akhilesh Kumar Yadav

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.