By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.K.Dhananjayan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4.
2 The petitioner would aver that she was appointed as a Secondary Grade Assistant in the services of the 5th respondent / School with effect from 01.06.2012 in the vacancy caused on account of the resignation of one Miss.J.Monisha on 30.04.2012 and it is also a regular sanctioned post and receiving Grant-in-Aid from the Government. The petitioner would further aver that the said school was established and being administered by the Catholic Religious Congregation of the The Roman Catholic Congregation of Daughters of Mary Help of Christians and for the purpose of legal perpetuity, it is a registered Society bearing Registration S.No.23/1946-1947, in the name and style of The Salesian Sisters' Society [India] and it has been established and is administering a number of educational institutions for the welfare of the Catholic Christian Minority Community and its rights are guaranteed under
Article 30[1] of the Constitution of India. The petitioner, on an earlier occasion, had filed WP.No.21229/2013 and this Court, vide order dated 01.08.2013 in MP.No.2/2013 in WP.No.21229/2013, directed the respondents to grant temporary approval of her appointment and to pay salary and since it was not complied with, contempt petition was filed and subsequently, temporary approval was also accorded and the petitioner, challenging the conditional order, filed WP.No.12567/2015 and the said writ petition along with the batch of other writ petitions were disposed of by this Court taking into consideration, the judgment reported in 2016 [7] MLJ 155 [The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Education Department, Chennai-9 and others Vs. S.Jeyalakshmi and others], wherein it has been held that the provisions of the Right to Education Act, 2009, is not applicable to the Minority Institutions and in utter violation of the said order, there was an oral instruction to the 5th respondent/School, not to submit the Pay Bill of the petitioner and though it was submitted for the months of November and December 2016, the Pay Bill was not honoured by the respondents and as such, the salary was not released for the petitioner from November 2016 onwards and therefore, the petitioner came forward to file the present writ petition.
3 Dr. Father Xavier Arul Raj, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms.A.Arul Mary, learned counsel on record, would submit that the oral instructions given to the 5th respondent/School, not to present the Pay Bill and not releasing the salary for the petitioner, is in, per se, violation of the orders passed by this Court in the above cited writ petitions and is also against the decision reported in 2016 [7] MLJ 155 [Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Education Department, Chennai-9 and others Vs. S.Jeyalakshmi and others], and further invited the attention of this Court to the proceedings of the Director of School Education, in Na.Ka.NO.34116/D1/E4/2013 dated 31.01.2017 and would submit that the said official had instructed the District Educational Officer as well as the subordinate officials to act according to the above cited orders passed by this Court and take necessary steps to pay salary from the date of joining duty by getting Grant-in-Aid and therefore, prays for appropriate orders. In this regard, the 5th respondent/School has sent a representation to the 4th respondent on 04.01.2017 and since no orders have been passed, the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court by filing the present writ petition.
4 This Court heard the submissions of Mr.K.Dhananjayan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 and perused the materials placed before this Court.
5 In the light of the ratio laid down by the Division Bench of this Court reported in 2016 [7] MLJ 155 [Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Education Department, Chennai-9 and others Vs. S.Jeyalakshmi and others], the provisions of the Right to Education Act, 2009, are inapplicable to the Minority Institutions and therefore, a pass in Teacher Eligibility Test in respect of the teachers employed in the said Institutions cannot be insisted. It is also an un-controverted fact that the petitioner has been appointed in a regularly sanctioned vacancy and as such, she is entitled to receive salary for the duties performed by them. The Director of School Education has taken into consideration the said fact and issued the above cited proceedings dated 31.01.2017 to the District Educational Officer which comes under his jurisdiction to take appropriate steps. In the considered opinion of the Court, the above cited decision is equally applicable to the case on hand and the respondents 1 to 4 are also bound by the above cited judgment.
6 In the light of the above facts and circumstances, the respondents 1 to 4 are directed to issue appropriate directions to the subordinate officials to take note of the judgment reported in 2016 [7] MLJ 155 [Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Education Department, Chennai-9 and others Vs. S.Jeyalakshmi and others], and issue appropriate directions for release of grant and payment of salary to the teachers employed in the Minority Institutions and the said exercise is to be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7 Insofar as the present writ petitions are concerned, in the light of the above facts and circumstances and the reasons assigned, the 4th respondent is directed to consider the representation of the 5th respondent/School dated 04.01.2017 on merits and in accordance with law and pass orders within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision taken, to the 5th respondent/School.
8 The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
09.02.2017 Index : No Internet : Yes NOTE:Issue order copy on 20.02.2017.
AP To
1.The Additional Chief Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu The Department of School Education [C2] Fort St George, Madras 600 009.
2.The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006.
3.The District Elementary Educational Officer O/o.The District Elementary Educational Officer Vellore, Vellore Fort 632004, Vellore District.
4.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Chinna Kulam Mariamman Street Tirupattur 635601, Vellore District.
5.The Correspondent Mary Immaculate Elementary School Tirupattur-635601 Vellore District.
M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J., AP W.P.No.3211/2017 09.02.2017