(ORDER OF THE COURT WAS MADE BY S.MANIKUMAR, J.) On 24th April 2017, we passed the following order:
"Contempt Petition No.1393 of 2016 has been directed to be listed before this Bench.
2. Petitioners have filed W.P.No.12873/2015, for a mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5, to remove the encroachment made by the respondents 6 to 8 therein, on road Poramboke in S.No.638 part, about 2 cents, in Poramboke Municipal Limits, providing Road/path way to the petitioners from their respective house in S.No.635/3 in Poonamallee Municipality.
3. Responding the prayer sought for, the Tahsildar, Poonamallee Taluk has filed a counter affidavit, stating that notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 has been served on the alleged encroachers, including the respondents 6 to 8 therein.
4. In the writ petition, the respondents 6 to 8 therein were not served.
5. A Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, in W.P.No.12873/2015, at para 4, ordered as hereunder:- At this stage, we are not inclined to keep the matter pending, particularly, when the petitioner is unable to supply the latest and correct addresses of the alleged encroachers, viz., respondents 6 to 8. However, we direct the official respondents 1 to 5 to take consequential action, pursuant to the afore stated notice issued under
Section 7 of the Act, on merits and in accordance with law. Such an exercise shall be completed at the earliest.
6. Alleging that the official respondents herein have not complied with the orders, made in W.P.No.12873/2015, instant contempt petition has been filed.
7. From the materials available on record, we find that pursuant to the orders made in W.P.No.12873/2015, dated 15/9/2015, the Tahsildar, Poonamallee, has conducted an enquiry and after considering the explanation, Village and Taluk records, prima facie found that there was encroachment, on the pathway, in Government poramboke land, in Survey No.638, Poonamallee Taluk and Municipality.
8. On this day, when the matter came up for hearing, on the basis of proceedings, in R.C.No.28834/2015/No.1, dated 6/8/2016, of the District Collector, Thiruvallur, Mr.K.V.Dhanapalan, learned Special Government Pleader submitted that after going through the records, the District Collector, Thiruvallur District has also sustained the order, issued under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Encroachment Act, 1905, dated 18/7/2016, passed by the Tahsildar, Thiruvallur District. He further submitted that the District Collector, Thiruvallur, vide proceedings, dated 6/8/2016, has directed the Tahsildar, Poonamallee, the Commissioner, Poonamallee Municipality, to remove the encroachments, within a week.
9. It is also brought to the notice this Court that the order, dated 6/8/2016, of the District Collector, Thiruvallur, referred to above, has been challenged by three persons, namely D.Ranjan, D.Ravichandran & D.Nataraj @ Michael. On the submission that a revision petition would be maintainable, under
Section 10 - A of the Tamil Nadu Encroachment Act 1905, writ petition has been disposed off.
10. Further, on the basis of proceedings, in R.C.No.28834/2015/No.1, dated 17/11/2015, Mr.D.Ravi, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the Commissioner of Poonamallee Municipality has been requested, to make a joint inspection, on 31/3/2017.
11. Mr.K.V.Dhanapalan, learned Special Government Pleader submitted that action has been taken to remove the encroachment. There is no intention to disobey the orders of this court.
12. Post on 1/6/2017 for filing compliance report. "
2. On this day, when the matter came up for further hearing, on instructions from the Tahsildar, Poonamallee and inviting attention of this Court to the proceedings in R.C.A2/17820/2013 dated 30.05.2017, addressed to the Government Pleader, High Court, Mr.K.V.Dhanapalan, learned Special Government Pleader submitted that in obedience to the order of this Court in W.P.no.12873 of 2015 dated 15.09.2015, in the presence of Police, Municipality and Revenue Officials after following necessary procedures under Land Encroachment Act, the following encroachments have been evicted on 19.05.2017:- Survey No. Classification Total extent Area under encroachment Nature of Encroachment Name of the Encroacher 638 Vazhi 0.03.0 7.8 Sq. Meter Compound Wall
1) Parthiban 7.2 Sq. Meter Front Portion of House
2) Sarada 109/2 Battai 150 Sq.M 10 Sq. Meter Brick Well
1) Ranjan 20 Sq. Meter Hut
2) Ramanarayan
3. Mr.D.Ravi, learned counsel for the contempt petitioner fairly submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with.
4. In the light of the above, the Contempt Petition is dismissed.
Today, the matter has come up under the caption For Being Mentioned.
2. On the basis of the details furnished in R.C.A2/17820/2013, dated 30/5/2017, in our order, dated 1/6/2017, in Contempt Petition No.1393 of 2016, one Ms.Sarada mentioned as an encroacher to the area of 7.2 sq.meter (front portion of house) and one Mr.D.Ramanarayanan, mentioned as encroacher to the area 20 Sq.meter (hut) have been stated to have been evicted on 19/5/2017.
3. Respondents have submitted that the name of Sarada has been shown mistakenly, instead of Sarala and the name of Mr.Ramanarayanan has been shown mistakenly, instead of Ravichandran. Accordingly, proceedings in R.C.A2/17820/2013, dated 30/5/2017, has been sent to the Government Pleader (High Court), Madras. S.MANIKUMAR,J A N D M.GOVINDARAJ,J mvs.
4. Registry is directed to amend accordingly, and issue the revised order.
5. Rest of the order is retained.
(S.M.K.,J) (M.G.R.,J) 10th July 2017. mvs. Contempt Petition No.1393 of 2016