IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA WRIT PETITION Nos.33680-33681/2017 & WRIT PETITION Nos.3773-3774/2018 (GM CPC) BETWEEN MASTER MOHAMMED ABDUL RAZAK S/O LATE TANVEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 1 YEAR 3 MONTHS SINCE PETITIONER LOST HIS PARENTS, HE IS REPRESENTED BY HIS PATERNAL GRAND PARENTS AS NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN 1. FAYAZ AHAMED, S/O LATE ABDUL AMEED, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 2. NILOFER, W/O FAYAZ AHAMED, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT WARD NO.13, MUSLIM BLOCK, MALAVALLI TOWN, MANDYA DISTRICT.
(BY SRI GOWRISHANKAR C, ADV.) AND 1. SADDAM HUSSAIN S/O JABBAR KHAN, MAJOR IN AGE ... PETITIONERS D.S.DODDI VILLAGE, KOLLEGALA TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571440 2. SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., S-5, 3RD FLOOR, MONARCH CHAMBERS, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU BY ITS MANAGER 3. SMT FAHMEEDA BEGUM, W/O. SHAFFI AHMED, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.352, 13TH CROSS, MYSURU-MAHADEVAPURA MAIN ROAD, SHANTHINAGARA, MYSURU CITY.
... RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD.12.5.2017 PASSED BY THE CHIEF JUDGE OF SMALL CAUSES AND MEMBER PRINCIPAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN M.V.C.NO.1475 OF 2016, M.V.C.NO.1476 OF 2016 AND M.V.C.NO.1479 OF 2016 VIDE ANNEX-N, P AND Q BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETIITON, CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE APPLICATION PRESENTED BY THE IMPLEADING APPLICANT UDNER ORDER I RULE 10(2) AND UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC VIDE ANNEX-K, L AND M BEFORE THE CHIEF JUDGE OF SMALL CAUSES AND MEMBER PRINCIPAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R These writ petitions are filed against the order dated 12.05.2017 in MVC Nos.1475/2016, 1476/2016 and 1479/2016 on the file of the Chief Judge of Small Causes and Member, Principal Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru (SCCH-20) ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said MVC Nos.1475/2016, 1476/2016 and 1479/2016 have been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petitions do not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petitions stand dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE PMR