(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Having perused the affidavit-in-reply of respondent no.3, and in view of the subsequent development, it was fairly considered by learned counsel Mr. Rachh that none of the prayers could now be considered. He, however, vehemently argued that the contracts were awarded to respondent no.4 and to other contractors thereafter in such manner that it called for an enquiry. However, that being neither the scope of nor the prayer in the petition, the petition is disposed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to take up any other appropriate proceeding in respect of his grievance. Notice is discharged with no order as to costs.
(D.H.WAGHELA, J.) (N.V.
ANJARIA, J.) (SN DEVU PPS) Top